Jump To Content

LearnHub




Multiple Interpretations of Hamlet

Watch these five actors interpret the famous “To Be or Not To Be” soliloquy from Act 3, Scene 1.

In order of appearance:

Mel Gibson (1990)
Laurence Olivier (1948)
Ethan Hawke (2000)
Kenneth Branagh (1996)
a


  1. lucyinthesky saidMon, 15 Dec 2008 16:44:13 -0000 ( Link )

    Naturally, my favourite is Arnold Schwarzenagger. “Something is rotten in the state of Denmark…and Hamlet is taking out the trash!”

    Actions
    Vote
    Current Rating
    1
    Rate Up
    Rate Down
    1 Total Vote

    Post Comments

  2. oLahav saidTue, 16 Dec 2008 19:27:33 -0000 ( Link )

    Is it just me, or is Laurence Olivier just about the best modern Shakesperean out there?

    And yes, Schwartzy was genious!

    Actions
    Vote
    Current Rating
    1
    Rate Up
    Rate Down
    1 Total Vote

    Post Comments

  3. lucyinthesky saidSat, 20 Dec 2008 01:25:45 -0000 ( Link )

    Laurence Olivier is definitely great, but I did quite like Kenneth Branagh’s performance as well. I actually had no idea there was a modern-day version of “Hamlet” set in New York with Hawke as the main character. I should go and rent it to see if it’s any good.

    Actions
    Vote
    Current Rating
    0
    Rate Up
    Rate Down
    No Votes

    Post Comments

  4. Shouldice saidTue, 23 Dec 2008 15:27:32 -0000 ( Link )

    I was just thinking that Branagh was the most convincing….and then I got all frustrated at the life imitating art imitating life bit about product placement in movies. Hawke’s soliloquy in a blockbuster pushes home the point about explicit sponsorship of movies…..I don’t like it.

    Actions
    Vote
    Current Rating
    1
    Rate Up
    Rate Down
    1 Total Vote

    Post Comments

  5. hcraig saidMon, 29 Dec 2008 14:33:54 -0000 ( Link )

    If it weren’t for the fact that it was in blockbuster, I personally would have liked Hawke’s portrayal the best. But it could just be that I’m a fan.

    Oren – it’s kinda funny that you’re referring to Olivier as modern Shakespeare when the film was made in 1948. But I do suppose it’s all relative, and in comparison to when it was written it is modern.

    Actions
    Vote
    Current Rating
    0
    Rate Up
    Rate Down
    No Votes

    Post Comments

  6. Yorrick saidWed, 31 Dec 2008 23:40:02 -0000 ( Link )

    I prefer Brannagh’s interpretation. In fact, I liked his whole movie, however that Schwarzenagger clip just transcended them all. :-)

    Actions
    Vote
    Current Rating
    0
    Rate Up
    Rate Down
    No Votes

    Post Comments

Your Comment
Textile is Enabled (View Reference)