Fascinating article, fascinating premise.
I believe that we’ve adapted ourselves to our environment & that includes technology.
Think back, think way back. Sesame Street was a conglomeration of short, snappy, “sound/image bites”. The notion of short burst of information is not new.
We’ve evolved into a culture that expects instant gratification. Time constraints, real or imagined are one factor; however, think about it, when were you taught to read critically? Were you taught to read criticallly?
Was reading, critically or not, accorded value? If you could get away with skimming & cribbing for your school reports what would motivate you to do more?
I’m a librarian & yes, I love to read. I do still read books – sometimes in print & sometimes in digital. I’m tasked with trying to explain why information literacy is an essential skill to a post-secondary audience. Once they get it they get it. Do they apply the reflective, critical thinking, evaluation skills? Not consistently. Why? When I ask I hear “No time” “No need”.
We’re probably all “guilty” to some degree. Granted we may utilize more targeted search terms, or cast our search nets wider, but do we review & evaluate each & every hit every time? Maybe, maybe not. Maybe only cursorily because we bring experience & a skillset that allows for some generalizations re: sources for example.
In the final review I come down on the side of it’s a tool and how we use it, (how we’ve been trained or not to use it) determines the outcome.
Post Comments
Poshmonkey said – Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:42:04 -0000
That’s absolutely fine. Thanks for your positive feedback.