I just had a debate about what art is last weekend with a friend of mine. He was describing a piece of art by an artist who just won a prestigious prize that sounded more like an innovative process rather than art to me. I have included the image. It is by Jeremy Hof, and called “Layer Painting Red”.

He won the prize because he impressed the judges with his mathematical approach toward painting that reveals itself upon close inspection. According to the judging panel, “What appeared to be a two-dimensional surface revealed itself as a three-dimensional, layered structure, confounding our understanding of what a traditional painting is.”
Is this art? Perhaps. Does it deserve a prestigious prize? The judges said it won because it confounded their understanding of painting. For me, innovation for innovation’s sake is not does not contribute to art’s greatness.
Post Comments
oLahav said – Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:42:14 -0000
I don’t much like country music either. And I completely agree with the radio comment, I never listen to the radio, ever. When I’m driving, I just listen to CDs (though that’s even more predictable, but at least I’m guaranteed to listen to what I like and not garbage).