I think that wikipedia is amazing, and this value of truth is really relevant. Basically we can especulate all day if its true or not. As an open source advocate I fight a very similar fight since all our software is done by arguably speaking ‘amateurs’ which can get in the source code and modify the code. But in the end things just work, this to a degree where the comunal knowledge far exceed the expectations of the so called ‘professional’ knowledge who is subject to other agenda like market deadlines or other surrounding noise.
As for the other side of the debate I most say that even some enviromentals could be hold true, the overal outcome is that we wouldn’t be able to process wide range of topic without this tool.
Is humanly imposible read on 10 different topics in 10 different minutes in the britanica as opposed to wikipedia. Just searching for this “books” is way slower than a search engine. And this “facts” holds themselves arguably true.
Post Comments
mawstools said – Wed, 21 May 2008 22:03:17 -0000
Thanks for taking time to post your thoughts, Jza! I’m wondering what you did with that hour this morning on WiiZiQ…would you be willing to say more? We’re all using WiZiQ in different ways and I’m wondering what a person with your background is finding really easy to do with the technology….