From the discussion Should Volunteers pay to participate in LImmud?
Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:48:30 -0000
Ok, I just got back from Limmud UK last week and I have a profoundly new appreciation for what they’ve done in terms of building volunteer culture and active participation on the part of community members. Over there, everyone is invited to volunteer, even a few minutes or an hour onsite. They do daily volunteer drives to get people to help with tasks around the conference and they have all kinds of opportunities posted for people to help with the planning of future conferences. For example, you can sign up to volunteer five minutes a week, or ten minutes, or an hour a week, depending on your availability. Everyone pays to attend and pretty much everyone ends up volunteering! It’s an incredible community of willing participants, who all take ownership of the whole experience. The only people who pay less than full price are people who come on “working” scholarships, and those people are requested to put in more volunteer service (e.g., an allotment of three or four hours a day). Their roles are pre-determined, not as spontaneous, but it’s a great way for people who can’t afford the full price to come to conference. As we move toward a multi-day conference in Toronto, I think we should really rethink the subsidy culture we’re creating here for volunteers—it’s an amazing thing to see all these people putting their time and money into a collective community-building project. I’m all for it!!!
Having said that, we can still develop scholarship programs for streams of volunteers. For example, in England, they use the YAD volunteers, a group of young adults who do service work, for about four hours a day. We could consider working with other community groups, like Hillel or UJA Impact (Young Adult Division), to develop special tracks for their constituents to participate in our conference in a meaningful, short-term capacity.